Home
Rants, Raves and Recollections (Whitecap $19.95)
Vancouver-born Rafe Mair has followed his musings in Canada: Is Anyone Listening? with Rants, Raves and Recollections (Whitecap $19.95). "The best place to keep it, I'm sure,"; he says, "is in the loo where, especially as the years go by, it takes a bit longer.";
Mair's passions include fishing, reading, family life and western alienation. The former Socred MLA first joined CKNW in 1984. Here's a 'rant' that supports Mair's contention that B.C. separation is not at all out of the question. He reflects on his experiences as chairman of B.C.'s Cabinet Constitutional Committee for three years:
"When I started visiting Ontario on a regular basis for a while twice or three times a month I was told by those knowledgeable sorts that thought the entire wisdom of the country abided in the Toronto Globe and Mail, that I would come to see that Ontarians and especially Torontonians really not only loved us but understood us. Well, I spent nearly half a decade putting that proposition to the test.
My contacts throughout this epiphany were Bill Davis-Buttermilk Billy-the premier of Ontario whom I watched at close range through endless conferences as well as his senior staff and political colleagues. I spent hours closeted with Ontario politicians and officials during the run-up to the patriation of the constitution. I may not have gotten to know the man on the street too well, but I sure as hell got to know the people who ran his affairs.
I went to Ontario convinced that central Canadians generally, and Ontarians specifically, knew little of British Columbia and cared even less. Not only did I not change my mind, my suspicions were emphatically confirmed. The bald truth is that Ontarians only consider British Columbia as a source of raw materials and chronic bitchers. They consider B.C. part of a seamless "West,"; which, of course, it is not. It was only very recently that the Toronto Globe and Mail, in its polls, stopped lumping B.C. in with the Prairies as if what was happening in The Pas, Manitoba, bore some relationship with Sooke, British Columbia...
This, of course, has very important ramifications for Canada. Ontario, with a quarter of the Senate and, through its perennial government caucus, control of the House of Commons, simply cannot understand why B.C. sees Senate reform as a major issue. It is utterly beyond that province's ability (John Nunziata, MP, excepting) to understand why we chafe under a system where 50 percent plus one of the House of Commons has 100 percent of the power. Nunziata is an exception perhaps because he was born and raised in B.C. before moving to Toronto.
Ontarians, generally speaking, see the country as an ongoing saga between Upper Canada and Lower Canada. In their view, solving that debate-or at least keeping it going without Lower Canada dropping out-is what Canada is all about and the other provinces aside from Quebec should simply stay on the sidelines and cheer Ontario on. There isn't the slightest understanding of B.C. history. Ontarians don't know and don't care that, unlike the Prairie provinces, B.C. entered Confederation as a self-governing colony and did so after negotiating as a high contracting party with the five provinces that then made up the country. They don't understand that the deal wasn't to enter a two-party partnership, Quebec on the one hand and the rest led by Ontario on the other. British Columbia would never have accepted this "two founding nation"; concept of the country and doesn't for a second accept this notion now.
Much of Canada's recent constitutional history reflects this central Canadian misunderstanding of Canada as seen through the eyes of British Columbians. Meech Lake and the Charlottetown Accord (so called) would have perpetuated central Canadian hegemony over the country through agreements that only faintly sugarcoated that fact. British Columbians by nearly 70 percent demonstrated that they understood this when they voted in the Charlottetown referendum of October 26, 1992.
So Ontario and Quebec don't understand how British Columbia came into being. Because some Quebecers and some Ontarians did indeed move to B.C. in the early years, it is wrongly assumed that the province was populated by some great east-west migration such as occurred in the United States. In fact, B.C. was mostly populated from the south and the west, initially, and thereafter by people who arrived directly from the United Kingdom. The Ontario version of the "typical"; Canadian has never lived in British Columbia. Also much misunderstood is the geography of the province. I well remember attending a constitutional conference in the 1970s where there was a huge wooden map of Canada on the wall. Missing were the Queen Charlotte Islands! When I questioned my hosts, they were amazed that I would be sensitive to the fact that these great islands, which carry so much native and non-native history, should be expunged from our geography. Again, in itself, perhaps no big deal. But cumulatively, little things like this do betray an astonishing ignorance of Canada's third largest province. (In fact, B.C. will overtake Quebec as the second largest about midway through the twenty-first century, which helps explain why Ontario and Quebec especially want preserved forever the status quo.) Central Canadians would do well to fly over B.C. and see how everything-its mountains, rivers, and islands-all flow north-south so they don't see it as such a mystery why British Columbian thinking also goes the same way. Central Canadians would also be well advised to try to understand the notion of Cascadia, which, while it will never become a political reality, may well express British Columbia's economic future.
There is, in my opinion, a grave danger that British Columbia will leave Confederation. It certainly will do so if Quebec goes. But it may go anyway. As political decentralization around the world paradoxically goes hand and hand with economic unions, British Columbia may well find it in its interests to leave Canada and go it alone in NAFTA.
This sort of thing doesn't happen by revolution, armed or otherwise. It comes when regions feel unrepresented and uncared for and British Columbia is both of those. It may well be that after another decade or so of chafing under central Canadian absolute rule plus central Canadian indifference, British Columbia will become, what it might have been in the first place but for the threat of American "Manifest Destiny,"; an independent nation with friendly neighbours to both the east and south.
Then it will no longer be necessary for people in central Canada to ask, what the hell's the matter with those people out there? What's the matter and what always has been the matter-as I found out for myself-is that "back there"; they really don't give a damn about us. -- Rafe Mair
1-55285-145-1
[BCBW SPRING 2001]
Mair's passions include fishing, reading, family life and western alienation. The former Socred MLA first joined CKNW in 1984. Here's a 'rant' that supports Mair's contention that B.C. separation is not at all out of the question. He reflects on his experiences as chairman of B.C.'s Cabinet Constitutional Committee for three years:
"When I started visiting Ontario on a regular basis for a while twice or three times a month I was told by those knowledgeable sorts that thought the entire wisdom of the country abided in the Toronto Globe and Mail, that I would come to see that Ontarians and especially Torontonians really not only loved us but understood us. Well, I spent nearly half a decade putting that proposition to the test.
My contacts throughout this epiphany were Bill Davis-Buttermilk Billy-the premier of Ontario whom I watched at close range through endless conferences as well as his senior staff and political colleagues. I spent hours closeted with Ontario politicians and officials during the run-up to the patriation of the constitution. I may not have gotten to know the man on the street too well, but I sure as hell got to know the people who ran his affairs.
I went to Ontario convinced that central Canadians generally, and Ontarians specifically, knew little of British Columbia and cared even less. Not only did I not change my mind, my suspicions were emphatically confirmed. The bald truth is that Ontarians only consider British Columbia as a source of raw materials and chronic bitchers. They consider B.C. part of a seamless "West,"; which, of course, it is not. It was only very recently that the Toronto Globe and Mail, in its polls, stopped lumping B.C. in with the Prairies as if what was happening in The Pas, Manitoba, bore some relationship with Sooke, British Columbia...
This, of course, has very important ramifications for Canada. Ontario, with a quarter of the Senate and, through its perennial government caucus, control of the House of Commons, simply cannot understand why B.C. sees Senate reform as a major issue. It is utterly beyond that province's ability (John Nunziata, MP, excepting) to understand why we chafe under a system where 50 percent plus one of the House of Commons has 100 percent of the power. Nunziata is an exception perhaps because he was born and raised in B.C. before moving to Toronto.
Ontarians, generally speaking, see the country as an ongoing saga between Upper Canada and Lower Canada. In their view, solving that debate-or at least keeping it going without Lower Canada dropping out-is what Canada is all about and the other provinces aside from Quebec should simply stay on the sidelines and cheer Ontario on. There isn't the slightest understanding of B.C. history. Ontarians don't know and don't care that, unlike the Prairie provinces, B.C. entered Confederation as a self-governing colony and did so after negotiating as a high contracting party with the five provinces that then made up the country. They don't understand that the deal wasn't to enter a two-party partnership, Quebec on the one hand and the rest led by Ontario on the other. British Columbia would never have accepted this "two founding nation"; concept of the country and doesn't for a second accept this notion now.
Much of Canada's recent constitutional history reflects this central Canadian misunderstanding of Canada as seen through the eyes of British Columbians. Meech Lake and the Charlottetown Accord (so called) would have perpetuated central Canadian hegemony over the country through agreements that only faintly sugarcoated that fact. British Columbians by nearly 70 percent demonstrated that they understood this when they voted in the Charlottetown referendum of October 26, 1992.
So Ontario and Quebec don't understand how British Columbia came into being. Because some Quebecers and some Ontarians did indeed move to B.C. in the early years, it is wrongly assumed that the province was populated by some great east-west migration such as occurred in the United States. In fact, B.C. was mostly populated from the south and the west, initially, and thereafter by people who arrived directly from the United Kingdom. The Ontario version of the "typical"; Canadian has never lived in British Columbia. Also much misunderstood is the geography of the province. I well remember attending a constitutional conference in the 1970s where there was a huge wooden map of Canada on the wall. Missing were the Queen Charlotte Islands! When I questioned my hosts, they were amazed that I would be sensitive to the fact that these great islands, which carry so much native and non-native history, should be expunged from our geography. Again, in itself, perhaps no big deal. But cumulatively, little things like this do betray an astonishing ignorance of Canada's third largest province. (In fact, B.C. will overtake Quebec as the second largest about midway through the twenty-first century, which helps explain why Ontario and Quebec especially want preserved forever the status quo.) Central Canadians would do well to fly over B.C. and see how everything-its mountains, rivers, and islands-all flow north-south so they don't see it as such a mystery why British Columbian thinking also goes the same way. Central Canadians would also be well advised to try to understand the notion of Cascadia, which, while it will never become a political reality, may well express British Columbia's economic future.
There is, in my opinion, a grave danger that British Columbia will leave Confederation. It certainly will do so if Quebec goes. But it may go anyway. As political decentralization around the world paradoxically goes hand and hand with economic unions, British Columbia may well find it in its interests to leave Canada and go it alone in NAFTA.
This sort of thing doesn't happen by revolution, armed or otherwise. It comes when regions feel unrepresented and uncared for and British Columbia is both of those. It may well be that after another decade or so of chafing under central Canadian absolute rule plus central Canadian indifference, British Columbia will become, what it might have been in the first place but for the threat of American "Manifest Destiny,"; an independent nation with friendly neighbours to both the east and south.
Then it will no longer be necessary for people in central Canada to ask, what the hell's the matter with those people out there? What's the matter and what always has been the matter-as I found out for myself-is that "back there"; they really don't give a damn about us. -- Rafe Mair
1-55285-145-1
[BCBW SPRING 2001]
Submitted on June 24, 2003 in By David.
